explore-blog:

Study looks at the demographics of New York Times obituaries over the past 70 years. Some of the findings: 

• In the 1940s and ’50s, the paper ran many more obits than it does today; some were but a single paragraph.
• Prior to 1960, cause of death was not always included; today, it usually is. In our survey, aids was first listed as a cause of death in 1992.
• Where the dead were educated has remained relatively constant: The Ivy League reigns supreme.
• The obits have always been male-heavy. In 1972, a typical female obit was two paragraphs, and spoke not of the deceased’s accomplishments but of those of her husband and sons.
• Starting in the 1990s, the obits became more diverse, racially and ethnically, but also in terms of people who had distinguished themselves in occupations other than business or politics—attorneys, artists, scientists, athletes, and actors.

Previously, the appalling gender ratios of mainstream media’s obituaries. 

Reblogging for Bridget— though the bold’d part was interesting. (Emphasis mine.)

explore-blog:

Study looks at the demographics of New York Times obituaries over the past 70 years. Some of the findings: 

• In the 1940s and ’50s, the paper ran many more obits than it does today; some were but a single paragraph.

• Prior to 1960, cause of death was not always included; today, it usually is. In our survey, aids was first listed as a cause of death in 1992.

• Where the dead were educated has remained relatively constant: The Ivy League reigns supreme.

• The obits have always been male-heavy. In 1972, a typical female obit was two paragraphs, and spoke not of the deceased’s accomplishments but of those of her husband and sons.

• Starting in the 1990s, the obits became more diverse, racially and ethnically, but also in terms of people who had distinguished themselves in occupations other than business or politics—attorneys, artists, scientists, athletes, and actors.

Previously, the appalling gender ratios of mainstream media’s obituaries

Reblogging for Bridget— though the bold’d part was interesting. (Emphasis mine.)

(Source: , via explore-blog)

  1. poeticsheretic reblogged this from explore-blog
  2. theblogofdeath reblogged this from explore-blog
  3. jrroykovich2 reblogged this from explore-blog
  4. wastelandweazle reblogged this from macaroni-overlord
  5. macaroni-overlord reblogged this from femme-fatalist
  6. they-will-call-me-the-contender reblogged this from explore-blog
  7. femme-fatalist reblogged this from explore-blog
  8. silentwind reblogged this from explore-blog
  9. momo-mi-momo-mi reblogged this from explore-blog
  10. hellolovelyscientist reblogged this from explore-blog
  11. minddaydream reblogged this from explore-blog
  12. absentandcounting reblogged this from explore-blog
  13. s-m-i reblogged this from bustr and added:
    Emphasis mine.
  14. b-fo reblogged this from bunny-bea
  15. katesie reblogged this from explore-blog
  16. maneatingbadger reblogged this from explore-blog
  17. worldtea reblogged this from explore-blog
  18. happinessandotherlies reblogged this from explore-blog
  19. delusionsofstature reblogged this from explore-blog and added:
    Ladies of yore: You may be dead, but gender inequality is alive and well.
  20. sarahyphenanne reblogged this from explore-blog
  21. marvelousmelmo reblogged this from explore-blog
  22. ottermindkyoto reblogged this from explore-blog
  23. prettythingsandbutterflywings reblogged this from explore-blog
  24. bunny-bea reblogged this from tealrallythong
  25. mommified reblogged this from explore-blog
  26. rrrrred reblogged this from explore-blog and added:
    Reblogging for Bridget— though the bold’d part was interesting. (Emphasis mine.)
  27. hypercubic reblogged this from explore-blog
  28. hrkeyser reblogged this from explore-blog and added:
    This is worth considering for a host of implications or just because it is pretty interesting.
  29. the-lord-is-my-coelacanth reblogged this from explore-blog
  30. brookelikesbuttz reblogged this from explore-blog